How did the number of people reporting English at home change in New Brunswick?
The answer
The number of people reporting English at home increased in New Brunswick.
What this answer shows
- Measure
- Number of people reporting English at home
- Area shown
- New Brunswick
- Period
- 2001–2016Occasional
- Unit
- Count
Selected details
- Language
- English
Number of people reporting English at home rose from 542,130 to 567,345 between 2001 and 2016—an increase of 25,215, or 4.7%. It reached an observed high of 568,470 in 2011 before ending at 567,345 in 2016.
Statistics Canada table 15-10-0009-01Updated August 21, 2020Data through 2016
- Overall change
- +25,215
- 4.7% increase
- Start · 2001
- 542,130
- Latest · 2016
- 567,345
Across Canada
Compare provinces and territories
See the same official measure and period across all 13 places where it is available.
Number of people reporting English at home in New Brunswick
4 observations · 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2016
- Number of people reporting English at home567,345
- Observed high
- 568,4702011
- Observed low
- 542,1302001
Hover or tap the chart, or use the slider. Left and right arrow keys move one period at a time.
The vertical scale is focused on the observed values and does not start at zero.
Exact values4 observations · 2001–2016
| Period | Number of people reporting English at home |
|---|---|
| 2016Latest | 567,345 |
| 2011 | 568,470 |
| 2006 | 543,885 |
| 2001 | 542,130 |
About this data
Data shown through 2016Table updated
These are the selections used for this answer. The full Statistics Canada table (15-10-0009-01) contains other measures and breakdowns.
Adapted from Statistics Canada, English, French and non-official languages spoken at home by geography, 2001 to 2016, 2020-08-21. This does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada of this product.
How this answer was calculatedThe headline compares the first and last observations shown. Absolute change is the last source value minus the first; relative change is (last ÷ first − 1) × 100. Intermediate observations remain visible in the chart and exact values. This is descriptive and does not identify causes.